Mensajes: 69
	Temas: 8
	Registro en: Sep 2006
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		true stalking... or masters of stalking are usually regarded as tricksters or mean... I myself have utilized stalking for things that could classify under old seer stalking.. but I think there is no way around it... all stalking done properly is devious...
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Mensajes: 308
	Temas: 23
	Registro en: Apr 2006
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		That may be true, but I think it is important to consider how you personally interpret the meaning of "devious". When I hear the word devious, I immediately think of someone doing something evil, no good, out to hurt others for their own benefit.
But I think being devious in terms of stalking differs from the generally understood meaning of the word. It does mean being sly, cunning and ruthless. But without self-importance involved, being devious has no real "evil" connotations. I'm basically just talking about semantics and intention here.
It is only a matter of perception as to what it means for someone to be "honest and upfront". It is only a matter of perception as to what it means for something to be "true".
This is all a play anyway. All a great drama between birth and death.
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Mensajes: 69
	Temas: 8
	Registro en: Sep 2006
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		The meaning I had in mind is the same as you just portrayed... I didn't mean ruthless manipulation for SELF benefit..
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Mensajes: 174
	Temas: 42
	Registro en: May 2006
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		Stalking should begin with the four emotions: fear, anger, joy and melancholy. 
I can understand when it would be usefull to exaggerate your persona, so as too make things "bigger than life," and in so doing see that it's not neccessary to take yourself so seriously or understand that certain behaviors are foreign to you or conversely, that you can push yourself beyond certain limits.
Trying on new facades may be fun, entertaining, and interesting, but ulitmately you drain yourself of your personal power. There is no honor or strength to be gained from being capricious. Acting on whim, acting out, etc only feeds self importance. This behavior is not founded in impeccability.
It is not at all a matter of perception what it means to be honest and up front. Nor is truth relative.
You all know this - it is this knowing you wish to solidify. This is silent knowledge.
This knowing doesn't need to be defended with words or rationalizations because as we sit quietly within ourselves, we know it to be true. Believe without believing.
	
	
	
This user is a merge of users with less than 5 posts or all posts in less than one week. Maybe the merged is more interesting than the original users.
Este usuario es una combinación de usuarios con menos de 5 mensajes o que escribió todo en menos de una semana. Quizá el usuario combinado resulte mas interesante que los usuarios originales.
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Mensajes: 70
	Temas: 11
	Registro en: Aug 2006
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		lilac when i read your words i understand because i was there, and even today after all my battles i must admit there are times when i feel pulled to feel that way again. my self-importance compels me to say, that there was no one more shy or self obsorbed than i. and i miss that comfy state of mind at times. but YOU can and will change. Don Juan said that "most people don't realize that they can change anything they want about themselves in the blink of an eye". and that he himself proceeded to "chip off" the things about himself that he needed to change.
the difference between being a sociopath and stalking in my estimation is this. 
in stalking the intent is impeccability. in sociopathology the intent is the "self". same action, different intent.